Gary Hodge and Robert Hart III v. Stephen Kraft Ind. and as Member on Behalf of Grupo Habanero LLC ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • R:\13598.000 l \pleadings\mtns&ords\mtn exped disc.docx
    CAUSE NO. 2014-CI-18038
    STEPHEN KRAFT INDIVIDUALLY AND                              §        IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
    AS A MEMBER ON BEHALF OF                                    §
    GRUPO HABANERO, LLC                                         §
    Plaintiffs                                              §
    §
    vs.                                                         §        225 1h JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    §
    GARY HODGE AND ROBERT HART III                              §
    Defendants                                                  §        BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS
    PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY
    NOW COMES STEPHEN KRAFT, Individually and as a member on behalf of GRUPO
    HABANERO, LLC ("Plaintiffs") and files this their Motion for Expedited Discovery and would
    show unto the court as follows:
    I.
    Plaintiffs have filed suit against the Defendants GARY HODGE and ROBERT HART III
    for breach of the employment contract of Stephen Kraft and breach of their fiduciary duties to
    Grupo Habanera LLC in taking actions to freeze out a minority member by oppressive conduct,
    including refusing Plaintiff Stephen Kraft access to the financial documents of the company, to
    which he is entitled by law.
    II.
    Defendants have recently filed a Motion to Abate and Compel Arbitration in this case based
    upon section 3 .4( e) of the employment agreement with Plaintiff Stephen Kraft. See "Exhibit A" to
    Plaintiffs' Original Petition. Forgetting for the moment that the arbitration clause is very narrow,
    and Plaintiffs' claims for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty are well outside its scope,
    its' application is entirely dependent on a set of circumstances that never occurred.
    In order to be effective, Defendants must first have properly exercised the repurchase
    option by providing notice and closing the sale within thhiy (30) days of the termination ofPlaintiff
    Stephen Kraft's employment. Notice could only have been given by serving the exercise of the
    option in writing either personally to Plaintiff Stephen Kraft or by sending the notice U.S. cetiified
    mail return receipt requested to Plaintiff Stephen Kraft's correct address, neither of which
    occmTed. See "Exhibit A" to Plaintiffs' Original Petition section 6.1. As Defendants are claiming
    that they did properly serve notice, Plaintiffs need to conduct discovery on this crucial issue prior
    to any evidentiary hearing on the Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration, including written
    discovery and taking the depositions of the Defendants. As Defendants have indicated that they
    intend to set their Motion to Compel Arbitration before any discovery has been conducted,
    Plaintiffs would ask that the court modify the discovery rules under TEX. R.    OF   Crv. PRo. 191, to
    require that Defendants answer Plaintiffs' discovery requests attached hereto as "Exhibit A" within
    14 days and at least three days prior to any evidentiary hearing on Defendants' Motion To Compel
    Arbitration. In the alternative, Plaintiffs request that the Motion to Compel Arbitration not be set
    until Plaintiffs' discovery has been answered in the normal course of time and Plaintiffs and
    Defendants have agreed upon a setting date.
    III.
    WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED Plaintiffs STEPHEN KRAFT, Individually
    and as a member on behalf of GRUPO HABANERO, LLC pray that this comi grant their motion
    for expedited discovery and require that Defendants answer Plaintiffs' discovery requests attached
    hereto as "Exhibit A" within 14 days of the Comi's order and at least ten days prior to any
    evidentiary hearing on Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration. In the alternative Plaintiffs pray
    that Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration not be set until Plaintiffs' discovery has been
    answered in the normal course. of time and Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed upon a setting
    date and for such other further relief to which Plaintiffs may show themselves justly entitled.
    Respectfully submitted,
    EsPEY & AssociATEs, PC
    13750 San Pedro Avenue, Suite 730
    San Antonio, Texas 78232
    Telephone:    (210) 404-0333
    Telecopier:   (210) 4IT~-0336
    /   c'__.,.~
    S~/
    By: ---------------------------------
    RICHARD W. ESPEY
    State Bar No. 06667580
    respey(a)lawespey. com
    MATTHEW B. SOLIDAY
    State Bar No. 24079367
    msoliday(W,lawespey.com
    ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS, STEPHEN KRAFT,
    lNDIVIDUALL Y AND AS A MEMBER ON BEHALF OF GRUPO
    HABANERO,    LLC
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that a true and conect copy of the foregoing document was served in
    compliance with Rules 21 and 21a ofthe Texas Rules of Civil Procedure on December 8, 2014, on
    the following counsel of record:
    Roderick J. 'Rod' Regan
    Branscomb I PC
    711 Navarro, Suite 500
    San Antonio TX 78401-0036
    210.598.5405 Facsimile
    Attorneys for Defendants
    RICHARD W. ESPEY
    MATTHEW B. SOLIDAY
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-15-00056-CV

Filed Date: 5/14/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016