Paul L. Foster, William Eugene Powell, R. Steven Hicks, Nash M. Horne, Robert L. Stillwell, Alex M. Cranberg, Wallace L, Hall, Jr., Brenda Pejovich, Ernest Aliseda, and Jeffrey D. Hildebrand, in Their Official Capacities as Regents v. American Society of Landscape Architects, Inc. and the American Society of Landscape Architects' Library and Education Advocacy Fund, Inc., Individually and on Behalf of Sustainable Sites Initiative, an Unincorporated Nonprofit Association ( 2015 )

ACCEPTED
03-14-00097-CV
5180550
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
5/6/2015 3:53:50 PM
JEFFREY D. KYLE
CLERK
No. 03-14-00097-CV
In the FILED IN
3rd COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
Court of Appeals for the 5/6/2015 3:53:50 PM
Third Judicial District at Austin, Texas
JEFFREY D. KYLE
Clerk
PAUL L. FOSTER, WILLIAM EUGENE POWELL, R. STEVEN HICKS,
NASH M. HORNE, ROBERT L. STILLWELL, ALEX M. CRANBERG, WALLACE L. HALL,
JR., BRENDA PEJOVICH, ERNEST ALISEDA, AND JEFFREY D. HILDEBRAND,
IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY; AND CRAIG
WESTEMEIER, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ASSOCIATE ATHLETICS DIRECTOR
Appellants,
v.
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC., AND
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS’ LIBRARY AND EDUCATION
ADVOCACY FUND, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF
SUSTAINABLE SITES INITIATIVE, AN UNINCORPORATED NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION,
Appellees.
On Appeal from the
98th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas
SUGGESTION OF MOOTNESS
TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:
This dispute centers on the University’s actions with regard to its ownership
of intellectual property related to the “Sustainable Sites Initiative.” See Appellant’s
Br. at 2-7. Following a dispute as to the proper procedural framework for obtaining
federal trademark protection for the program, the University filed its own trademark
application. See Appellant’s Br. at 9.
The University is now transferring its interest in the program to a third party,
Green Business Certification, Inc., which will perform oversight and certification
programs. Pursuant to that agreement, the University has officially assigned its
ownership interest in any trademark related to the Sustainable Sites Initiative to
Green Business Industries. The affidavit of Lee Smith explaining this new third-
party agreement, to which is attached a copy of the executed assignment, is attached
to this filing. See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.220(C) (providing for consideration of
affidavit evidence related to jurisdiction).
A case becomes moot on appeal when “the parties lack a legally cognizable
interest case in the outcome.” Heckman v. Williamson County, 369 S.W.3d 137, 162
(Tex. 2012). The relief requested in the live petition is all related to allegations
regarding the University’s ownership of the intellectual property. CR.27 (seeking
declaratory judgment that University is not the “one true owner” of the trademarks,
relief precluding University from applying for trademark protection). Because the
University has affirmatively disclaimed any ownership interest in the trademarks by
assigning its ownership interests to a third party, ASLA no longer has any legally
cognizable interest in a lawsuit that seeks to establish that the University either does
2
not own the trademarks or is not the exclusive owner thereof. ASLA’s claims are
now moot.
The appropriate remedy when a case becomes moot on appeal is to vacate any
underlying orders and dismiss the cause. TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(e); e.g., Speer v.
Presbyterian Children’s Home and Serv. Agency, 847 S.W.2d 227, 229 (Tex. 1993)
(requiring vacatur and dismissal of underlying orders when case becomes moot);
Tex. State Bd. of Veterinary Med. Exam’rs v. Giggleman, 408 S.W.3d 696, 704 (Tex.
App.—Austin 2013, no pet.) (applying Speer); see also Freeman v. Burrows, 171
S.W.2d 863, 863 (Tex. 1943) (“When a cause becomes moot on appeal, all previous
orders and judgments should be set aside and the cause, not merely the appeal,
dismissed.”).
This case is, substantively, about the University’s ownership of the
intellectual property. The University has now disclaimed any ownership of the
intellectual property by assigning it to a third party. Accordingly, the case has
become moot on appeal and the Court should vacate any underlying orders and
dismiss the cause.
3
Respectfully submitted,
KEN PAXTON
Attorney General of Texas
CHARLES E. ROY
First Assistant Attorney General
SCOTT A. KELLER
Solicitor General
/s/ Kristofer S. Monson
KRISTOFER S. MONSON
Assistant Solicitor General
State Bar No. 24037129
OFFICE OF THE TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL
P.O. Box 12548 (MC 059)
Austin, Texas 78711-2548
Tel.: (512) 936-1700
Fax: (512) 474-2697
kristofer.monson@texasattorneygeneral.gov
Counsel for Appellants
4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
On May 6, 2015, this document was served via File&ServeXpress on:
Kurt Kuhn
Kuhn Hobbs PLLC
3307 Northland Drive, Suite 210
Austin, Texas 78731-4946
kurt@kuhnhobbs.com
/s/ Kristofer S. Monson
KRISTOFER S. MONSON
5