Jimil Brown v. State ( 2015 )

Affirmed and Opinion Filed May 26, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-00490-CR
No. 05-14-00491-CR
No. 05-14-00492-CR
No. 05-14-00493-CR
JIMIL JOHNTE BROWN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-33944-M, F10-33945-M, F12-33914-M, F12-34048-M
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Schenck
Opinion by Justice Bridges
Jimil Johnte Brown appeals four convictions, after adjudication of his guilt, for two
offenses of delivery of marijuana in an amount over one-fourth ounce, one theft of property
offense, and one offense of possession of cocaine in an amount less than one gram. See TEX.
HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. §§ 481.115(a), (b), 481.120(a), (b)(3) (West 2010); TEX. PENAL
CODE ANN. § 31.03(a), (e)(4)(A) (West Supp. 2014). The trial court assessed punishment in
each case at twenty months’ confinement in a state jail. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a
brief in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets
the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional
evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See
High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a
copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he
did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App.
2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree
the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeals.
We affirm the trial court’s judgments.
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
140490F.U05
/David L. Bridges/
DAVID L. BRIDGES
JUSTICE
‐2‐
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
JIMIL JOHNTE BROWN, Appellant Appeal from the 194th Judicial District
Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
No. 05-14-00490-CR V. F10-33944-M).
Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Lang and Schenck participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered May 26, 2015
‐3‐
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
JIMIL JOHNTE BROWN, Appellant Appeal from the 194th Judicial District
Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
No. 05-14-00491-CR V. F10-33945-M).
Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Lang and Schenck participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered May 26, 2015.
‐4‐
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
JIMIL JOHNTE BROWN, Appellant Appeal from the 194th Judicial District
Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
No. 05-14-00492-CR V. F12-33914-M).
Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Lang and Schenck participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered May 26, 2015.
‐5‐
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
JIMIL JOHNTE BROWN, Appellant Appeal from the 194th Judicial District
Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
No. 05-14-00493-CR V. F12-34048-M).
Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Lang and Schenck participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered May 26, 2015.
‐6‐