Randall Oneal Mathis v. Fredericka Antoinette Mathis ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                          NO. 12-17-00049-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    RANDALL ONEAL MATHIS,                                     §    APPEAL FROM THE 115TH
    APPELLANT
    V.                                                        §    JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    FREDERICKA ANTOINETTE
    MATHIS,                                                   §    UPSHUR COUNTY, TEXAS
    APPELLEE
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
    On February 10, 2017, the clerk of this Court notified Appellant, Randall Oneal Mathis,
    that the filing fee in this appeal is due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Appellant was informed that
    failure to remit the filing fee on or before February 21, 2017, would result in the Court’s taking
    appropriate action, including dismissal of the case without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    42.3(c). The date for remitting the filing fee has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the
    Court’s request.
    Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is
    dismissed. See id.
    Opinion delivered February 28, 2017.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (PUBLISH)
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    FEBRUARY 28, 2017
    NO. 12-17-00049-CV
    RANDALL ONEAL MATHIS,
    Appellant
    V.
    FREDERICKA ANTOINETTE MATHIS,
    Appellee
    Appeal from the 115th District Court
    of Upshur County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 372-15)
    THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being
    considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.
    It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that
    this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court
    below for observance.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-17-00049-CV

Filed Date: 2/28/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/1/2017