Shannon Day v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Order filed November 30, 2016
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    ____________
    No. 11-16-00255-CR
    __________
    SHANNON DAY, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 441st District Court
    Midland County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. CR46225
    ORDER
    Shannon Day is currently represented by court-appointed counsel, Matt
    Zimmerman; however, it appears that Day may wish to represent himself on appeal.
    When this court received a pro se brief from Day on November 7, 2016, the clerk of
    this court informed him by letter that we were unable to file the pro se brief. As we
    explained in the letter, Day is not entitled to hybrid representation and is currently
    represented by court-appointed counsel. In response, Day has filed in this court a
    timely request to proceed pro se on appeal. We abate this appeal.
    We must abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court so that the
    trial court may determine the following:
    1. Whether Day desires to prosecute his appeal;
    2. Whether Day remains indigent;
    3. If not indigent, whether Day has retained counsel for this appeal; and
    4. If indigent, whether Day desires to have counsel appointed to represent him
    in this appeal or whether, after being warned of the dangers and
    disadvantages of self-representation, Day competently and intelligently
    chooses to exercise the right to represent himself.
    If it is determined that Day is indigent and is exercising his right to represent himself,
    the trial court must develop evidence as to whether Day’s decision to proceed
    without counsel is knowingly and intelligently made. See Faretta v. California, 
    422 U.S. 806
    (1975); Ex parte Davis, 
    818 S.W.2d 64
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Hubbard v.
    State, 
    739 S.W.2d 341
    , 345 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987); Webb v. State, 
    533 S.W.2d 780
    ,
    783–86 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976). The trial court is directed to enter findings of fact
    and conclusions of law and to make any appropriate recommendations to this court.
    The clerk of the trial court is directed to prepare and forward to this court a
    supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings, recommendations, and any
    orders of the trial court. The court reporter is directed to prepare and forward to this
    court the reporter’s record from the hearing. These records are due to be filed in this
    court on or before December 30, 2016.
    The appeal is abated.
    November 30, 2016                                             PER CURIAM
    Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
    Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
    2