Nathaniel Norris v. State ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                     In The
    Court of Appeals
    Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
    No. 06-16-00152-CR
    NATHANIEL NORRIS, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 76th District Court
    Morris County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 11,423CR
    Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
    Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Nathaniel Norris was convicted by a jury of sexual assault of a child and sentenced to five
    years’ imprisonment. On appeal, Norris argues that the trial court erred (1) in admitting allegedly
    unauthenticated Facebook Messenger texts sent by cell phone and (2) in assessing court costs in
    this case, and all companion cases, even though they were consolidated for trial.1
    We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date on Norris’ appeal in cause
    number 06-16-00150-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that the trial court
    did not abuse its discretion in overruling Norris’ objection of improper authentication, and further
    find that Norris’ second issue is moot, since the trial court entered a judgment nunc pro tunc
    removing the assessment of court costs.
    However, we note that, in entering the judgment nunc pro tunc, the trial court mistakenly
    listed the incorrect statute of offense for which Norris was convicted. We have the authority to
    modify the judgment to make the record speak the truth when the matter has been called to our
    attention by any source. TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2; French v. State, 
    830 S.W.2d 607
    , 609 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 1992); Rhoten v. State, 
    299 S.W.3d 349
    , 356 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2009, no pet.). “Our
    authority to reform incorrect judgments is not dependent on the request of any party, nor does it
    turn on a question of whether a party has or has not objected in trial court; we may act sua sponte
    1
    Norris also appeals one conviction of indecency with a child entered in companion cause number 06-16-00150-CR,
    two other convictions of sexual assault of a child entered in companion cause numbers 06-16-00151-CR and 06-16-
    00153-CR, and one conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child entered in companion cause number 06-16-
    00154-CR.
    2
    and may have a duty to do so.” 
    Rhoten, 299 S.W.3d at 356
    (citing Asberry v. State, 
    813 S.W.2d 526
    , 531 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d); see 
    French, 830 S.W.2d at 609
    .
    Accordingly, we modify the trial court’s judgment nunc pro tunc to reflect that Norris was
    convicted under Section 22.011 of the Texas Penal Code, instead of Section 22.11. See TEX.
    PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.011 (West 2011). We affirm the judgment, as modified.
    Josh R. Morriss, III
    Chief Justice
    Date Submitted:       April 21, 2017
    Date Decided:         April 27, 2017
    Do Not Publish
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-16-00152-CR

Filed Date: 4/27/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/2/2017