William Everette Razor v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
    NO. 03-14-00379-CR
    William Everette Razor, Appellant
    v.
    The State of Texas, Appellee
    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    NO. 70483, THE HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT, JUDGE PRESIDING
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    A jury convicted appellant William Everette Razor of aggravated assault causing
    serious bodily injury, see Tex. Penal Code § 22.01(a)(1), and assessed his punishment at confinement
    in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for 13 years, see 
    id. § 12.33.
                 Appellant’s
    court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the
    appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California by
    presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable
    grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 744 (1967); Garner v. State,
    
    300 S.W.3d 763
    , 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 81–82 (1988).
    Appellant’s counsel has certified to this Court that he sent copies of the motion and
    brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se
    response, and provided a motion to assist appellant in obtaining the record. See Kelly v. State,
    
    436 S.W.3d 313
    , 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also 
    Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
    . To date,
    appellant has not filed a pro se response or requested an extension of time to file a response.
    We have conducted an independent review of the record and find no reversible error.
    See 
    Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
    ; 
    Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766
    ; Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    , 826–27
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious
    grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The
    judgment of conviction is affirmed.
    __________________________________________
    Melissa Goodwin, Justice
    Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field
    Affirmed
    Filed: May 22, 2015
    Do Not Publish
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-14-00379-CR

Filed Date: 5/22/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/17/2015