X. L. Jefferson, Jr. v. State ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
    NO. 03-01-00181-CR
    X. L. Jefferson Jr., Appellant
    v.
    The State of Texas, Appellee
    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    NO. 006560, HONORABLE FRANK W. BRYAN JR., JUDGE PRESIDING
    A jury found appellant X. L. Jefferson Jr. guilty of delivering less than one gram of
    cocaine. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a), (b) (West Supp. 2002). The jury
    assessed punishment at imprisonment for seven years after finding that the offense was committed
    within 1000 feet of a playground. See 
    id. § 481.134(b)(1).
    In his only point of error, appellant
    contends the evidence did not raise an issue as to whether the enhanced punishment provision applied,
    and therefore the district court erred by submitting the question to the jury. We will overrule this
    contention and affirm the conviction.
    The delivery of less than one gram of cocaine, ordinarily a state jail felony, is a third
    degree felony if committed within 1000 feet of a playground. 
    Id. “A ‘playground’
    means any
    outdoor facility that is not on the premises of a school and that (A) is intended for recreation; (B) is
    open to the public; and (C) contains three or more separate apparatus intended for the recreation of
    children, such as slides, swing sets, and teeterboards.” 
    Id. § 481.134(a)(3).
    Appellant argues that
    there was no evidence that the alleged playground in question, located at the Salvation Army facility
    in downtown Austin, was open to the public.
    Warren Stallworth, shelter director at the Salvation Army, answered affirmatively
    when asked if the playground was open to the public. Stallworth explained that the Salvation Army’s
    services are available to the general public, and that the playground is for the use of Salvation Army
    clients who have children. Stallworth acknowledged that the playground did not have unlimited
    access in the manner of a city park. Instead, access to the playground is monitored to prevent drug
    and alcohol abuse on the grounds. The outside gate to the playground is locked, and the playground
    must be entered from the lobby of the Salvation Army building. Adults without children do not have
    access to the playground.
    The Health and Safety Code does not define “open to the public.” Thus, we construe
    the term according to common usage. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 311.011(a) (West 1998). Contrary
    to appellant’s implicit argument, we do not believe that a playground, or any other place, is “open
    to the public” only if access is unrestricted and unsupervised. The testimony in this cause raised a fact
    issue whether the Salvation Army playground was open to the public, and the district court did not
    err by submitting the enhancement issue to the jury. Appellant’s point of error is overruled.
    2
    The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
    __________________________________________
    David Puryear, Justice
    Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear
    Affirmed
    Filed: December 20, 2001
    Do Not Publish
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-01-00181-CR

Filed Date: 12/20/2001

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021