in the Interest of A.M.G., a Child ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                     In The
    Court of Appeals
    Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
    No. 06-19-00032-CV
    IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.G., A CHILD
    On Appeal from the 354th District Court
    Hunt County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 85846
    Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
    ORDER
    As a result of a petition filed by the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services,
    the trial court terminated Mother’s parental rights to A.M.G. Mother appeals. By our order dated
    June 26, 2019, we abated this appeal so the trial court could provide the proper notices as required
    by the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). Because the supplemental clerk’s record does not reflect
    compliance with our order, we must abate this case a second time.
    Our previous order required the trial court to comply with all requirements of 25 C.F.R.
    § 23.11 and the Bureau of Indian Affairs Guidelines for State Courts; Indian Child Custody
    Proceedings (BIA Guidelines), 44 Fed. Reg. 67,584 (Nov. 26, 1979)). Our order specified,
    “Section 23.11 . . . requires that the notice be sent to the ‘appropriate Regional Director’ and the
    Secretary of the Interior.” It further recited Section 23.11, which states:
    Notice must include the requisite information identified in § 23.111, consistent with
    the confidentiality requirement in § 23.111(d)(6)(ix). Copies of these notices must
    be sent to the appropriate Regional Director listed in paragraphs (b)(1)
    through (12) of this section by registered or certified mail with return receipt
    requested or by personal delivery and must include the information required by §
    23.111.
    25 C.F.R. § 23.11 (emphasis added).
    In response to our order requiring the proper ICWA notices, we received a supplemental
    clerk’s record; however, that record does not demonstrate that notices were sent to the Regional
    Director as ordered. Also, it appears that the notice to the Secretary of the Interior was mailed to
    an incorrect address.
    First, as explained in our prior order, the address for the appropriate Regional Director—
    as determined by application of 25 C.F.R. § 23.11(b)(4)—is “Anadarko Regional Director, Bureau
    2
    of Indian Affairs, P.O. Box 368, Anadarko, Oklahoma 73005.” 25 C.F.R. § 23.11(b)(4).1
    Additionally, notices from Hunt County pursuant to Section 23.111(e) must also be sent to the
    Regional Director for the Western Region at 2600 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85004.
    The address for the Secretary of the Interior is “Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street, N.W.,
    MS-4660-MIB, Washington, D.C. 20240.” 2
    Failure to comply with the notice requirements of the ICWA provisions creates the danger
    of invalidation of parental rights termination proceedings. Because the supplemental clerk’s
    record does not demonstrate that the proper notices were sent, we again abate the appeal in cause
    number 06-19-00032-CV with the following instructions:
    (1) the trial court shall provide proper notices that comply with the ICWA’s
    statutory notice requirements discussed herein no later than August 26, 2019;
    (2) the trial court shall thereafter conduct a hearing, no later than September 18,
    2019, to determine whether A.M.G. is an Indian child under the ICWA;
    (3) the trial court shall cause a record of the proceedings to be prepared and shall
    make appropriate findings as to whether A.M.G. is an Indian child;
    (4) the reporter’s record from the hearing shall be filed with this Court no later than
    September 25, 2019; and
    (5) a supplemental clerk’s record (including any orders and findings resulting from
    the ICWA hearing) shall be filed with this Court no later than September 25, 2019.
    1
    We refer the trial court to the BIA website and the “Search by Zip” feature at https://www.bia.gov/regional-offices.
    2
    See https://www.bia.gov/contact-us.
    3
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4. Due to the accelerated nature of parental-rights termination proceedings,
    all matters relating to this order must be handled in an expedited fashion. This appeal will be
    reinstated upon receipt of the supplemental clerk’s record.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    BY THE COURT
    Date: August 20, 2019
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-19-00032-CV

Filed Date: 8/20/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/21/2019