Maria Guadalupe Martinez v. Benjamin Edward Parker ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •        TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
    NO. 03-18-00730-CV
    Maria Guadalupe Martinez, Appellant
    v.
    Benjamin Edward Parker, Appellee
    FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
    NO. C-1-CV-16-003407, THE HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    In a June 28, 2018 order, the trial court dismissed for want of prosecution Maria
    Guadalupe Martinez’s personal-injury lawsuit against Benjamin Edward Parker. Martinez timely
    filed a verified motion to reinstate her cause on July 26, 2018, which extended the deadline for
    filing a notice of appeal to ninety days after the trial court signed its dismissal order. See Tex. R.
    App. P. 26.1(a)(3). Martinez’s motion to reinstate was overruled by operation of law when the
    trial court did not rule on it within seventy-five days of the date it signed the dismissal order. See
    Tex. R. Civ. P. 165a(3).
    Martinez filed a notice of appeal challenging the trial court’s denial of her motion
    to reinstate on November 11, 2018—more than ninety days after the trial court signed its
    dismissal order, which makes her notice of appeal untimely. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(3);
    McCoy v. North Forest Indep. Sch. Dist., No. 14-07-00523-CV, 
    2007 WL 5209540
    , at *2 (Tex.
    App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 15, 2007, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (dismissing
    untimely appeal because order denying motion to reinstate is not separately appealable order
    from which appellate timeline is calculated); Weik v. Second Baptist Church of Hous.,
    
    988 S.W.2d 437
    , 438 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. denied) (holding that deadline
    for perfecting appeal runs from date of dismissal order, not from date of trial court’s ruling on
    motion to reinstate). We sent Martinez notice that her appeal would be dismissed if she did not
    provide us within ten days proof of timely mailing of her notice of appeal. More than ten days
    have elapsed, and we have received no response from Martinez.
    Because Martinez did not timely file her notice of appeal, we do not have
    jurisdiction and must dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
    __________________________________________
    Thomas J. Baker, Justice
    Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly
    Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
    Filed: August 23, 2019
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-18-00730-CV

Filed Date: 8/23/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/23/2019