Pamela Gale Johnson, Trustee and Plaza at San Jacinto Park, Ltd. v. Helm Companies ( 2005 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued February 25, 2005









    In The

    Court of Appeals  

    For The  

    First District of Texas  

    ____________


    NO. 01-03-01110-CV

    ____________


    PAMELA GALE JOHNSON, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR THE BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF STEPHEN C. HELM; STEPHEN C. HELM, GREEN MEADOWS GENERAL CORP.; WOOD HOLLOW PARTNERS, LTD.; WOODHOLLOW GENERAL CORP.; SHADY CREEK GENERAL CORP.; PLAZA AT SAN JACINTO PARK, LTD.; PLAZA GENERAL CORP.; RESERVE AT AUTUMN CREEK, LTD; 212 RESERVE GENERAL CORP.; HORIZON RESIDENTIAL, INC.; AND WATERFORD GP MANAGEMENT CORP., Appellants


    V.


    HELM COMPANIES, Appellee





    On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

    Harris County, Texas

    Trial Court Cause No. 2001-62744






    MEMORANDUM OPINION  


              By order dated September 1, 2004, we dismissed the appeal of Stephen C. Helm; Green Meadows General Corp.; Wood Hollow Partners, Ltd; Wood Hollow Gerneral Corp.; Shady Creek General Corp.; Plaza General Corp.; Reserve at Autumn Creek, Ltd; 212 Reserve General Corp.; Horizon Residential, Inc.; and Waterford GP Management Corp., leaving as the only two remaining appellants, Pamela Gale Johnson, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Stephen C. Helm and Plaza at San Jacinto Park, Ltd.

              On November 10, 2004, we granted the motion to dismiss the appeal of Pamela Gale Johnson, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Stephen C. Helm, leaving Plaza at San Jacinto Park, Ltd. as the sole remaining appellant versus the appellee, Helm Companies. Appellant Plaza at San Jacinto Park, Ltd. has failed to timely file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a) (failure of appellant to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant Plaza at San Jacinto Park, Ltd. did not respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). Plaza at San Jacinto Park, Ltd.’s appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief.

              The entire appeal is now dismissed.

              Any pending motions are denied as moot.

     

    PER CURIAM

    Panel consists of J. Nuchia, Jennings, and Alcala.

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-03-01110-CV

Filed Date: 2/25/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/2/2015