-
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTHNO. 2-04-260-CV
FLAGS USA, L.L.C. APPELLANT
V.
STEVE SYMONDS APPELLEE
----------
FROM 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT
----------
On April 25, 2005, we notified appellant that its brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.
Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.
DELIVERED: May 26, 2005
NOTES
1. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Document Info
Docket Number: 02-04-00260-CV
Filed Date: 5/26/2005
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/3/2015