Corey Wayne Sedwick v. State ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •      TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
    NO. 03-00-00238-CR
    Corey Wayne Sedwick, Appellant
    v.
    The State of Texas, Appellee
    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    NO. 99-974-K277, HONORABLE MICHAEL JERGINS, JUDGE PRESIDING
    A jury found appellant Corey Wayne Sedwick guilty of possessing cocaine and
    tampering with physical evidence. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a), (c) (West
    Supp. 2000); Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 37.09 (West Supp. 2000). The jury assessed punishment
    for these offenses, enhanced by a previous felony conviction, at imprisonment for terms of
    seventy-five and fifteen years.
    Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
    frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
    arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    (1988); High v. State,
    
    573 S.W.2d 807
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 
    516 S.W.2d 684
    (Tex. Crim. App.
    1974); Jackson v. State, 
    485 S.W.2d 553
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 
    436 S.W.2d 137
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant
    was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief
    has been filed.
    We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is
    frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the
    appeal.
    The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
    Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice
    Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Patterson
    Affirmed
    Filed: November 2, 2000
    Do Not Publish
    2