Ricky Joe Freeland v. State ( 2002 )


Menu:
  • TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN






    NO. 03-01-00654-CR


    Ricky Joe Freeland, Appellant


    v.



    The State of Texas, Appellee








    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

    NO. 52,195, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING


    Appellant Ricky Joe Freeland pleaded guilty to aggravated assault. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.02(b)(3) (West 1994) (retaliation against witness or prospective witness). At his subsequent sentencing hearing, the court imposed a sentence of life imprisonment.

    Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

    We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.

    The judgment of conviction is affirmed.





    __________________________________________

    Jan P. Patterson, Justice

    Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear

    Affirmed

    Filed: April 11, 2002

    Do Not Publish