Donald Ray Hicks v. State ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                                    NO. 07-05-0109-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    AT AMARILLO
    PANEL D
    DECEMBER 20, 2005
    ______________________________
    DONALD HICKS,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    _________________________________
    FROM THE 140th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
    NO. 2005-408202; HON. JIM BOB DARNELL, PRESIDING
    _______________________________
    ABATEMENT AND REMAND
    __________________________________
    Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
    Donald Hicks (appellant) appeals his conviction for burglary of a habitation with
    intent to commit theft. The clerk’s record was filed on July 8, 2005, a supplemental clerk’s
    record was filed on November 3, 2005, and the reporter’s record was filed on October 21,
    2005. Thus, appellant’s brief was due to be filed no later than December 5, 2005. That
    date passed without appellant filing a brief, however. So, on December 6, 2005, this court
    notified appellant that neither the brief nor an extension of time to file the brief had been
    received by the court and unless a brief or a response was filed by December 16, 2005,
    the appeal would be abated to the trial court. No response or brief has been received by
    the court.
    Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 140th District Court
    of Lubbock County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall
    immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to
    determine the following:
    1.     whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and,
    2.     whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of
    counsel due to appellate counsel’s failure to timely file appellate brief.
    See Evitts v. Lucey, 
    469 U.S. 387
    , 394, 
    105 S. Ct. 830
    , 834-35, 83 L.
    Ed.2d 821, 828 (1985) (holding that an indigent defendant is entitled
    to the effective assistance of counsel on the first appeal as of right
    and that counsel must be available to assist in preparing and
    submitting an appellate brief).
    We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law
    addressing the foregoing subjects. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to
    pursue the appeal, is indigent, and has been denied effective assistance of counsel, we
    further direct it to appoint new counsel to assist in the prosecution of the appeal. The
    name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new counsel,
    if any, who will represent appellant on appeal must also be included in the court’s findings
    of fact and conclusions of law. Furthermore, the trial court shall also cause to be
    developed 1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions
    of law and 2) a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the
    aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk’s
    record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before January 20, 2006. Should
    2
    additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or
    before January 20, 2006.
    It is so ordered.
    Per Curiam
    Do not publish.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-05-00109-CR

Filed Date: 12/20/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015