Rodger Wayne Mitchell v. State ( 2006 )

NO. 07-06-0056-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
OCTOBER 16, 2006
______________________________
RODGER WAYNE MITCHELL,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
_________________________________
FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF CASTRO COUNTY;
NO. A3024-0506; HON. ROBERT W. KINKAID, JR., PRESIDING
_______________________________
Memorandum Opinion
_______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
Rodger Wayne Mitchell (appellant) appeals his conviction for burglary of a
habitation. He was convicted by a jury and sentenced to twenty years confinement and a
fine of $10,000. Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, together
with an Anders1 brief, in which he certified that, after diligently searching the record, the
appeal was without merit. Appellant filed a response on August 4, 2006.
In compliance with the principles enunciated in Anders, appellate counsel reviewed
the various stages of the trial and discussed several potential areas for appeal. However,
he adequately explained why each argument lacks merit. We have also conducted our
own review of the record and appellant’s response to assess the accuracy of appellate
counsel’s conclusions and to uncover any error pursuant to Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.3d
503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Our own review has failed to reveal any reversible error.
Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.
Brian Quinn
Chief Justice
Do not publish.
1
Anders v. California, 386 U .S. 738, 744-45, 87 S.C t. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (19 67).
2