Charles Edward Bell v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 20, 2015.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-14-00893-CR
    NO. 14-14-00894-CR
    CHARLES EDWARD BELL, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 182nd District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause Nos. 1412841, 1413580
    MEMORANDUM                     OPINION
    Appellant appeals two convictions for aggravated robbery with a deadly
    weapon. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in each appeal which she
    concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Each brief meets the
    requirements of Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), by presenting a
    professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable
    grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    , 811–13 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 1978).
    Copies of counsel’s briefs were delivered to appellant. Appellant filed a pro
    se response. See Stafford v. State, 
    813 S.W.2d 503
    , 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).
    We have reviewed the records, counsel’s briefs, and appellant’s response
    carefully and agree each appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we
    find no reversible error in either record. We are not to address the merits of each
    claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined
    there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    ,
    827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
    Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Brown
    Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-14-00894-CR

Filed Date: 10/20/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/30/2016