Jimmy Earl Parr v. State ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •   

     

    IN THE

    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

     

    No. 10-05-00232-CR

     

    Jimmy Earl Parr,

                                                                          Appellant

     v.

     

    The State of Texas,

                                                                          Appellee

     

     

       


    From the 54th District Court

    McLennan County, Texas

    Trial Court No. 2003-667-C

     

    MEMORANDUM  Opinion

     


              I hereby recuse myself from further participation in this case.  See Tex. R. App. P. 16.2; Tex. R. Civ. P. 18b(2)(g).

     

                                                                                        _____________________________

                                                                                        FELIPE REYNA

                                                                       Justice

     

                                                                       Date: ________________________

    text-align:left;z-index:1; mso-position-horizontal:center' from="0,8.65pt" to="94.05pt,8.65pt">

     


    No. 10-05-00205-CR

     

    EX PARTE Damion Nelson

     

      

     


    Original Proceeding

     

    MEMORANDUM Opinion

     


              Damion Nelson filed a writ of habeas corpus concerning a pre-adjudication application for relief pursuant to Article 11.08 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.  Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.08 (Vernon 1977).

              Nelson filed the writ with this Court because he believed we have jurisdiction to issue writs per our opinion in In re Piper, 105 S.W.3d 107, 110 (Tex. App.—Waco 2003, orig. proceeding).  However, this Court is not a “district court.”  This Court is an intermediate appellate court and has no authority to issue this type of pre-trial writ of habeas corpus.  See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.05 (Vernon 1977); see also Tex. Const. art. V, § 6.

              Accordingly, the writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

     

     

                                                                       TOM GRAY

                                                                       Chief Justice

    Before Chief Justice Gray,

              Justice Vance, and

              Justice Reyna

    Writ dismissed

    Opinion delivered and filed April 27, 2005

    Do not publish

    [OT06]

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-05-00232-CR

Filed Date: 12/15/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/10/2015