in the Interest of H. D., a Child ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                                    NO. 12-08-00245-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    §           APPEAL FROM THE
    IN THE INTEREST OF
    §           COUNTY COURT AT LAW
    H.D., A CHILD
    §           RUSK COUNTY, TEXAS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate
    Procedure 42.3(a). The trial court’s judgment terminating Appellant’s parental rights was signed
    on April 1, 2008. The procedures for an accelerated appeal apply to an appeal in which the
    termination of the parent-child relationship is in issue. TEX . FAM . CODE ANN . § 109.002(a) (Vernon
    2002). Under rule of appellate procedure 26.1(b), the notice of appeal in an accelerated appeal must
    be filed within twenty days after the judgment or other order is signed, i.e., April 21, 2008.
    Appellant filed a motion for new trial on April 28, 2008 and a notice of appeal on May 29, 2008.
    Filing a motion for new trial does not extend the time to perfect an accelerated appeal. TEX . R. APP.
    P. 28.1. Therefore, Appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely because it was not filed on or before
    April 21, 2008, and this court has no jurisdiction to consider the appeal.
    On June 17, 2008, this court notified Appellant pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate
    Procedure 42.3(a) that his notice of appeal was untimely, and it informed him that unless the record
    was amended on or before June 27, 2008 to establish the jurisdiction of this court, the appeal would
    be dismissed. The deadline for responding to this court’s notice has expired, and Appellant has
    neither responded to the notice nor established this court’s jurisdiction.
    Because this court is not authorized to extend the time for perfecting an appeal except as
    provided by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and 26.3, the appeal is dismissed for want of
    jurisdiction. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
    Opinion delivered June 30, 2008.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-08-00245-CV

Filed Date: 6/30/2008

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/10/2015