Moore, Marcus Carven v. State ( 2003 )

Affirmed and Opinion filed April 24, 2003

Affirmed and Opinion filed April 24, 2003.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-02-01231-CR

____________

MARCUS CARVEN MOORE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 926,849

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. On November 7, 2002, appellant entered into a post-conviction agreement to accept a sentence of ten years in prison in exchange for the abandonment of one of the enhancement paragraphs in the indictment.  As part of his agreement, appellant signed a written waiver of the right to appeal. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed April 24, 2003.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Fowler and Edelman.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).