Dominguez, Ramon Obdulio v. State ( 2004 )


Menu:
  • Affirmed; Opinion of July 13, 2004, Withdrawn; and Substituted Majority and Concurring Opinions filed November 2, 2004

    Affirmed; Opinion of July 13, 2004, Withdrawn; and Substituted Majority and Concurring Opinions filed November 2, 2004.

     

     

    In The

     

    Fourteenth Court of Appeals

    ____________

     

    NO. 14-03-00893-CR

    ____________

     

    RAMON OBDULIO DOMINGUEZ, Appellant

     

    V.

     

    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

     

     

    On Appeal from the 178th District Court

    Harris County, Texas

    Trial Court Cause No. 932,863

     

     

    S U B S T I T U T E D   C O N C U R R I N G   O P I N I O N

    I fully join in the majority opinion except for one point discussed in connection with appellant=s first issue.  The majority holds that appellant=s counsel did not object specifically enough the first time the prosecutor used the word Amurdered.@  I disagree that counsel failed to state the reasons for his objection.  Rather it appears to me that counsel=s objection was overruled before he had the opportunity to state his reasons for objecting.  I would hold only that counsel failed to preserve error because an objection was not lodged each time the prosecutor used the word Amurder.@

     

    /s/        Wanda McKee Fowler

    Justice

     

    Judgment rendered and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed November 2, 2004.

    Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Edelman, and Seymore.  (Edelman, J., majority.)

    Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

     

     

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-03-00893-CR

Filed Date: 11/2/2004

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/15/2015