James Charles Smith v. Pioneer Homes Builders, Inc. ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • Motion Denied and Order filed December 14, 2012
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    ____________
    NO. 14-12-00825-CV
    ____________
    JAMES CHARLES SMITH, Appellant
    V.
    PIONEER HOMES BUILDERS, INC., Appellee
    On Appeal from the 133rd District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 2011-57739
    ORDER
    This appeal is from a judgment signed August 28, 2012. The notice of
    appeal was filed August 31, 2012. To date, the appellate filing fee of $175.00 has
    not been paid. On September 20, 2012, the court notified appellant that the filing
    fee was due. On November 5, 2012, the Harris County District Clerk’s office
    notified this court that appellant had not paid for preparation of the clerk’s record
    and had not filed an affidavit of indigence. On November 6, 2012, notification was
    1
    transmitted to all parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of
    prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay
    for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    37.3(b).    On December 7, 2012, appellant filed a motion to proceed without
    payment of costs.1
    Appellant’s motion does not comply with the procedural or substantive
    requirements of Rule 20 and is therefore DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(b).
    However, we may not dismiss an appeal for defects in procedure without allowing
    a reasonable to time correct the defects or without giving the affiant an opportunity
    to amend his affidavit to correct substantive defects. Tex. R. App. P. 44.3; Higgins
    v. Randall County Sheriff's Office, 
    193 S.W.3d 898
    , 899 (Tex. 2006).
    Accordingly, we order appellant to correct the defects in compliance with Texas
    Rule of Appellate Procedure 20 within fifteen days of the date of this order. See
    Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(b). If appellant fails to timely comply in accordance with
    this order, the appeal will be dismissed.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.
    1
    Even if a party proceeded as a pauper in the trial court, a new affidavit of indigence must be
    filed in the trial court after judgment for purposes of appeal. Holt v. F.F. Enterprises, 
    990 S.W.2d 756
    , 758 (Tex. App.CAmarillo 1998, pet. denied). A free record will be provided on
    appeal only if an affidavit of inability to pay the cost of the appeal is filed under Texas Rule of
    Appellate Procedure 20 and the trial court finds the appeal is not frivolous and the record is
    necessary to decide the appeal. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. ' 13.003(a). The party may
    then proceed without advance payment of costs if no contest is filed or the contest is not
    sustained by a written order. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-12-00825-CV

Filed Date: 12/14/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/23/2015