in Re: C.T. and T.T. ( 2014 )

DENY; and Opinion Filed September 16, 2014.
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-01157-CV
No. 05-14-01158-CV
No. 05-14-01159-CV
No. 05-14-01160-CV
No. 05-14-01161-CV
IN RE C.T. AND T.T., Relator
Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 13-21229-U
Trial Court Cause No. 10-12513-2
Trial Court Cause No. 13-21227-2
Trial Court Cause No. 01-11212-U
Trial Court Cause No. 12-275-U
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices O'Neill, Lang, and Brown
Opinion by Justice O'Neill
Relators filed this petition for writ of mandamus complaining of numerous actions of the
trial court. The facts and issues are well-known to the parties so we do not recount them here.
Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly
abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins.
Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we
conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
/Michael J. O'Neill/
MICHAEL J. O'NEILL
JUSTICE
141157F.P05
–2–