Kenneth Avery Farr v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed September 11, 2014.
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-13-01461-CR
    No. 05-13-01462-CR
    KENNETH AVERY FARR, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-55168-V, F13-57650-V
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices O’Neill, Lang-Miers, and Brown
    Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers
    Kenneth Avery Farr waived a jury, pleaded guilty to theft of property less than $1,500,
    having two prior theft convictions, and forgery by check.        See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN.
    §§ 31.03(a), (e)(4), 32.21(b), (d) (West 2011 & Supp. 2014). Also, in each case, appellant
    pleaded true to two enhancement paragraphs alleging prior state jail felony convictions. After
    finding appellant guilty, the trial court assessed punishment at four years’ imprisonment for the
    theft and five years’ imprisonment for the forgery. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.425(a)
    (West Supp. 2014). On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the
    appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record
    showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    , 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to
    appellant. See Kelly v. State, 
    2014 WL 2865901
    (Tex. Crim. App. June 25, 2014) (identifying
    duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).
    Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues After reviewing counsel’s brief,
    appellant’s pro se response, and the record, we agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit.
    See Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    , 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate
    court’s duty in Anders cases). We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the
    appeals.
    We affirm the trial court’s judgments.
    /Elizabeth Lang-Miers/
    ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS
    JUSTICE
    Do Not Publish
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47
    131461F.U05
    -2-
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    KENNETH AVERY FARR, Appellant                      Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District
    Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
    No. 05-13-01461-CR       V.                        F13-55168-V).
    Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers,
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                       Justices O’Neill and Brown participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
    Judgment entered September 11, 2014.
    -3-
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    KENNETH AVERY FARR, Appellant                      Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District
    Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
    No. 05-13-01462-CR       V.                        F13-57650-V).
    Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers,
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                       Justices O’Neill and Brown participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
    Judgment entered September 11, 2014.
    -4-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-13-01461-CR

Filed Date: 9/11/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/15/2015