in Re: Pablo D. Zuazu ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                          NO. 12-15-00079-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    IN RE:                                                    §
    PABLO D. ZUAZU,                                           §   ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    RELATOR                                                   §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    Relator Pablo D. Zuazu filed this original proceeding requesting a writ of mandamus
    directing the trial court to rule on his motion for a twenty-day hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM.
    PROC. ANN. art. 42.12 § 21(b) (West Supp. 2014). After Relator filed his mandamus petition, the
    trial court ordered Relator released on a $2,500.00 personal bond. The court further ordered that
    “the Henderson County Attorney’s Office and/or Henderson County Sheriff’s Department
    release any hold they have on this Defendant in reference to this pending Motion.”
    By letter dated April 14, 2015, the clerk of this court informed Relator that this
    proceeding would be referred to the court for dismissal as moot unless, on or before April 24,
    2015, he explained why the cause should be retained on the court’s docket. That deadline has
    passed, and Relator has not responded to this court’s notice. Accordingly, we dismiss Relator’s
    petition for writ of mandamus as moot.
    Opinion delivered April 30, 2015.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (DO NOT PUBLISH)
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    APRIL 30, 2015
    NO. 12-15-00079-CR
    PABLO D. ZUAZU,
    Relator
    V.
    HON. SCOTT WILLIAMS,
    Respondent
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by
    PABLO D. ZUAZU, who is the relator in Cause No. 2009-0698CL, pending on the docket of
    the County Court at Law No. 1 of Henderson, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having
    been filed herein on March 30, 2015, and the same having been duly considered, it is the opinion
    of this Court that a writ should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and
    ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as
    moot.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-15-00079-CR

Filed Date: 4/30/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015