Joe Bradley Roberson, Jr. v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                     COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    §
    JOE BRADLEY ROBERSON, JR.,                                     No. 08-13-00336-CR
    §
    Appellant,                                 Appeal from
    §
    v.                                                         Criminal District Court No. 3
    §
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                          of Tarrant County, Texas
    §
    Appellee.                                (TC # 1306790D)
    §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Joe Bradley Roberson, Jr. appeals his conviction of aggravated robbery with a deadly
    weapon. Appellant waived his right to a jury trial and entered an open plea of guilty. The trial
    court found Appellant guilty and assessed his punishment at imprisonment for ten years. We
    affirm.
    FRIVOLOUS APPEAL
    Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he has concluded that the
    appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.
    California, 386 U .S. 738, 
    87 S. Ct. 1396
    , 
    18 L. Ed. 2d 493
    , reh. denied, 
    388 U.S. 924
    , 
    87 S. Ct. 2094
    , 
    18 L. Ed. 2d 1377
    (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record
    demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See In re Schulman,
    
    252 S.W.3d 403
    , 407 n.9 (Tex.Crim.App. 2008)(“In Texas, an Anders brief need not specifically
    advance ‘arguable’ points of error if counsel finds none, but it must provide record references to
    the facts and procedural history and set out pertinent legal authorities.”); High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivered to Appellant,
    and Appellant has been advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se
    brief. Appellant has not filed a pro se brief.
    We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, and agree that the appeal is
    wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably
    support the appeal. The judgment is affirmed.
    March 19, 2015
    ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice
    Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Barajas, C.J., (Senior Judge)
    (Barajas, C.J., Senior Judge, sitting by assignment, not participating)
    (Do Not Publish)
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-13-00336-CR

Filed Date: 3/19/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015