Jay Hartsell v. Donald Ray Parrish ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                          NO. 12-13-00221-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    JAY HARTSELL,                                              §    APPEAL FROM THE 392ND
    APPELLANT
    V.                                                         §    JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    DONALD RAY PARRISH,
    APPELLEE                                                   §    HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal in which they state that they
    have settled their dispute. After reviewing the motion, the court is of the opinion that it should
    be granted. Accordingly, Appellant and Appellee’s joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the
    appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). The costs of this appeal are taxed to the party
    incurring them.
    Opinion delivered September 24, 2014.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
    (PUBLISH)
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    SEPTEMBER 24, 2014
    NO. 12-13-00221-CV
    JAY HARTSELL,
    Appellant
    V.
    DONALD RAY PARRISH,
    Appellee
    Appeal from the 392nd District Court
    of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2012B-1006A)
    THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the joint motion of the Appellant and
    the Appellee to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby
    ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted
    and the appeal be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.
    The costs of the appeal are taxed to the party incurring them.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-13-00221-CV

Filed Date: 9/24/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015