Rhina L. Gervis v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                               NUMBER 13-15-00199-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    ___________________________________________________________
    RHINA L. GERVIS,                                                                Appellant,
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
    ____________________________________________________________
    On appeal from the 398th District Court
    of Hidalgo County, Texas.
    ____________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria
    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
    Appellant, Rhina L. Gervis, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment
    entered by the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-1754-
    10-I. Judgment in this cause was signed on November 2, 2010.
    Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 provides that an appeal is perfected when
    notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed, unless a motion for
    new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). Where a timely motion for new trial
    has been filed, notice of appeal shall be filed within ninety days after the judgment is
    signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a).
    A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in
    good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1, but within the
    fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time.
    See Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617-18, 619 (1997) (construing the predecessor
    to Rule 26). However, appellant must provide a reasonable explanation for the late filing:
    it is not enough to simply file a notice of appeal. Id.; Woodard v. Higgins, 
    140 S.W.3d 462
    , 462 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2004, no pet.); In re B.G., 
    104 S.W.3d 565
    , 567 (Tex. App.
    —Waco 2002, no pet.).
    Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, appellant’s notice of appeal
    was due on December 2, 2010, but was not filed until April 21, 2015. On April 22, 2015,
    the Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to
    correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not
    corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter, the appeal would
    be dismissed. Appellant responded by filing a motion for extension of time to file the
    notice of appeal.    Appellant asserts she has good cause for the extension of time
    because she did not know it was possible to appeal the judgment.
    Although appellant has responded with an explanation regarding her late filing of
    the notice of appeal, appellant’s notice of appeal was filed beyond the fifteen-day grace
    period provided by rule 26.3. The Court, having examined and fully considered the
    documents on file and appellant’s failure to timely perfect his appeal, is of the opinion that
    the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant’s motion for extension
    2
    of time to file the notice of appeal is hereby DENIED. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby
    DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
    PER CURIAM
    Delivered and filed the
    14th day of May, 2015.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-15-00199-CV

Filed Date: 5/14/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015