in Re: Kelton Ray Thurman ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                            NO. 12-13-00295-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    IN RE:                                                    §
    KELTON RAY THURMAN,                                      §                 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    RELATOR                                                  §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    On September 25, 2013, Relator, Kelton Ray Thurman, filed a petition for writ of habeas
    corpus in which he alleges that he is being unlawfully confined in the Cherokee County Jail
    pursuant to a void contempt order. Based upon the grounds stated in his petition, he seeks to be
    released from custody.
    In an original habeas proceeding, the relator has the burden to provide this court with a
    record sufficient to establish his right to habeas corpus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1),
    52.7(a); Walker v. Packer, 
    827 S.W.2d 833
    , 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Here, however,
    Thurman has failed to provide us with a record that is sufficient to support his claims.1
    Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus.
    Opinion delivered October 31, 2013.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
    (PUBLISH)
    1
    On the date the petition was filed, the court sent Thurman a letter notifying him of the deficiencies.
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    OCTOBER 31, 2013
    NO. 12-13-00295-CV
    IN RE: KELTON RAY THURMAN, RELATOR
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed
    by Relator, KELTON RAY THURMAN, who is the Respondent in Cause No. 2012-01-0001,
    styled “In the Interest of Hannah Dianne Thurman, Allissa Mae Thurman, and Kyle Wain
    Thurman, Children,” pending on the docket of the County Court at Law of Cherokee County,
    Texas. Said petition for writ of habeas corpus having been filed herein on September 25, 2013,
    and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this court that a writ of
    habeas corpus should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that
    the said petition for writ of habeas corpus be, and the same is here by denied.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-13-00295-CV

Filed Date: 1/8/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015