Coy Lee Lorance v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Affirmed and Opinion Filed May 5, 2014
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-13-01230-CR
    No. 05-13-01231-CR
    COY LEE LORANCE, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court
    Collin County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause Nos. 199-82496-2012, 199-80454-2013
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Moseley, O’Neill, and FitzGerald
    Opinion by Justice FitzGerald
    Coy Lee Lorance pleaded guilty before a jury to five counts of sexual assault of a child
    and three counts of indecency with a child, as alleged in two indictments. See TEX. PENAL CODE
    ANN. §§ 21.11(a)(1), 22.011(a)(2) (West 2011). Appellant also pleaded true to one enhancement
    paragraph, as to each count. The jury found appellant guilty and the enhancement paragraphs
    true.   The jury assessed punishment on each sexual assault conviction at forty-two years’
    imprisonment. The jury assessed punishment on each indecency with a child conviction at
    thirty-one years’ imprisonment.    On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he
    concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of
    Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the
    record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    , 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to
    appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se
    response.
    We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    ,
    827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the
    appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support
    the appeal.
    We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
    Do Not Publish
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47
    131230F.U05
    /Kerry P. FitzGerald/
    KERRY P. FITZGERALD
    JUSTICE
    ‐2‐
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    COY LEE LORANCE, Appellant                          Appeal from the 199th Judicial District
    Court of Collin County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
    No. 05-13-01230-CR       V.                         199-82496-2012).
    Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald,
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                        Justices Moseley and O’Neill participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
    Judgment entered May 5, 2014
    /Kerry P. FitzGerald/
    KERRY P. FITZGERALD
    JUSTICE
    ‐3‐
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    COY LEE LORANCE, Appellant                          Appeal from the 199th Judicial District
    Court of Collin County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
    No. 05-13-01231-CR       V.                         199-80454-2013).
    Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald,
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                        Justices Moseley and O’Neill participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
    Judgment entered May 5, 2014
    /Kerry P. FitzGerald/
    KERRY P. FITZGERALD
    JUSTICE
    ‐4‐
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-13-01231-CR

Filed Date: 5/5/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015