Angela Urrabazo v. State ( 2015 )

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-14-00524-CR
Angela URRABAZO,
Appellant
v.
The STATE
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2012CR3361
Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 3, 2015
AFFIRMED
Angela Urrabazo pled true to violating the conditions of her deferred adjudication
community supervision and was sentenced to one year in state jail. Urrabazo’s court-appointed
attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes that the appeal has no merit. Counsel
provided Urrabazo with a copy of the brief and informed her of her right to review the record and
file her own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no
04-14-00524-CR
pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Although
a copy of the record was provided to Urrabazo, no pro se brief was filed.
After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and
without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel’s request to withdraw
is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute counsel will
be appointed. Should Urrabazo wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals, Urrabazo must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review
or Urrabazo must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary
review must be filed within thirty days from the later of: (1) the date of this opinion; or (2) the date
the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any
petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of
Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4.
Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-