Terry Shawn Linville v. State ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                  IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-12-00243-CR
    TERRY SHAWN LINVILLE,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    From the County Court at Law No. 2
    Johnson County, Texas
    Trial Court No. M201101154
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant, Terry Shawn Linville, who is not indigent and has retained counsel,
    appeals from his conviction for cruelty to livestock animals. On July 23, 2012, Linville
    filed with this Court a docketing statement, wherein he noted, among other things, that
    he has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the Clerk’s Record.
    On November 13, 2012, we informed Linville that if he “desires to proceed with
    this appeal, he must pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee and notify this
    Court of the actions taken within 21 days after the date of this letter.” We further
    notified Linville that a failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee within
    twenty-one days of our November 13, 2012 letter will result in his appeal being
    dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). Since filing his docketing
    statement, Linville has had no contact with this Court.
    Our review of the limited record reveals that Linville has completely failed in his
    duty to prosecute this appeal, to contact this Court, and to take any further action
    toward prosecuting this appeal. Accordingly, we conclude that Linville does not desire
    to prosecute this appeal. As such, we dismiss this appeal, under our inherent authority,
    for want of prosecution.1 See id.; Ealy v. State, 
    222 S.W.3d 744
    , 745 (Tex. App.—Waco
    2007, no pet.) (citing Peralta v. State, 
    82 S.W.3d 724
    , 725-26 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no
    pet.)); see also Evans v. State, No. 10-09-00251-CR, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 546, at *3 (Tex.
    App.—Waco Jan. 27, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
    AL SCOGGINS
    Justice
    Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Davis, and
    Justice Scoggins
    Dismissed
    Opinion delivered and filed January 31, 2013
    Do not publish
    [CR25]
    1   All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.
    Linville v. State                                                                    Page 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-12-00243-CR

Filed Date: 1/31/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015