Tristan Eric Bamber v. State ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • In The



    Court of Appeals



    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



    ____________________



    NO. 09-09-00317-CR

    ____________________



    TRISTAN ERIC BAMBER, Appellant



    V.



    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




    On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

    Jefferson County, Texas

    Trial Cause No. 08-3897




    MEMORANDUM OPINION

    Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Tristan Eric Bamber pled guilty to injury to an elderly individual. The trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Bamber guilty, but deferred further proceedings and placed Bamber on community supervision for eight years. The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke Bamber's unadjudicated community supervision. Bamber pled "true" to two violations of the conditions of his community supervision. The trial court found that Bamber violated the conditions of his community supervision, found Bamber guilty of injury to an elderly individual, and assessed punishment at eight years of confinement.

    Bamber's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On November 5, 2009, we granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant. We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment. (1)

    AFFIRMED.

    _________________________________

    DAVID GAULTNEY

    Justice



    Submitted on February 9, 2010

    Opinion Delivered February 17, 2010

    Do Not Publish



    Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.

    1. Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-09-00317-CR

Filed Date: 2/17/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015