Amanda Jackel v. State ( 2014 )

NUMBER 13-14-00027-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
AMANDA JACKEL, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On Appeal from the 52nd District Court
of Coryell County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria
Order Per Curiam
Currently pending before the Court is appellant's motion requesting pro se access
to the appellate record in the above-referenced cause.1 Appellant's counsel has filed an
1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals in Waco pursuant to a
docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001
(West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.).
Anders brief herein and appellant has been unable to examine the record so that she can
file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967).
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has
the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before thirty days from the date
of this order, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the
date upon which the appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v.
State, PD-0702-13, 2014 WL 2865901, at **3–4 (Tex. Crim. App. June 25, 2014).
Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record was first
made available to her to file her pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty
days thereafter to file its response, if any.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the
8th day of August, 2014.
2