Herman Lee Kindred v. State ( 2014 )

NUMBER 13-13-00526-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
HERMAN LEE KINDRED, Appellant,
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 24th District Court
of Jackson County, Texas.
ORDER ABATING APPEAL
Before and Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes
Order Per Curiam
This cause is before the Court on appellant’s motion for extension of time to file
the brief and appellant’s motion to bring to the Court’s attention that the record is
incomplete. Appellant is incarcerated and is proceeding pro se. Appellant’s motion for
extension of time states that the appellate record was made available to him on “DVD
disc” on April 1, 2014, but he does not have computer access to examine the record for
purposes of preparing his brief. Appellant is requesting an additional 90 days to file the
appellate brief in this cause. Appellant’s motion regarding the record asserts that the
reporter’s record omits relevant testimony from witness Ron White.
We first note that these motions are seemingly inconsistent insofar as appellant
asserts that he lacks access to the record, and yet asserts that the record is incomplete
based on his inspection.
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(e)(1) provides that inaccuracies in the
reporter’s record may be corrected by agreement of the parties or by the trial court. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6 (e)(1), (2). Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(e)(3) provides
that if a dispute arises after the reporter’s record has been filed in the appellate court, the
Court may submit the dispute to the trial court for resolution. See id. R. 34.6 (e)(3).
We GRANT appellant’s motion regarding the record insofar as this appeal is
ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court. Upon remand, the judge of the
trial court shall immediately cause notice to be given and conduct a hearing to determine
(1) whether inaccuracies exist in the reporter’s record, and if so, whether the parties can
agree to correct any of them without the court reporter’s recertification; and (2) to settle
the dispute if inaccuracies exist in the reporter’s record and the parties cannot agree on
whether or how to correct any of them. See Id. 34.6(e). Otherwise, the trial court shall
determine what steps are necessary to ensure the prompt preparation of a complete
reporter’s record and shall enter any orders required to avoid further delay and to preserve
the parties’ rights.
2
The trial court shall prepare and file its findings and orders and cause them to be
included in a supplemental clerk's record which should be submitted to the Clerk of this
Court within thirty days from the date of this order. Should the trial court require more
time to comply with the directions of this Court, it shall request an extension prior to the
expiration of this deadline.
If the trial court determines that the reporter’s record is accurate, or is able to
correct any alleged inaccuracies, the trial court shall further ensure that appellant has the
opportunity to fully examine the appellate record. In this regard, the appellate record
includes a sealed document, Exhibit No. 1. The trial court is directed to determine
whether or not appellant has the right to review the sealed document and must take any
and all appropriate measures to protect the confidentiality of such document. The trial
court shall notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made
available to appellant.
The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART appellant's motion for
extension of time to file the brief. This motion is GRANTED insofar as the Court will
extend appellant's deadline to file his brief. This motion is DENIED insofar as the Court
will not allow an extension of 90 days. Appellant is ORDERED to file his brief with this
Court within thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record is first made available to
him.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the
6th day of May, 2014.
3
4