-
Order filed November 3, 2011
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals
__________
No. 11-09-00344-CR
__________
SANTIAGO JIMMY RUIZ, Appellant
V.
STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 29th District Court
Palo Pinto County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 13887
O R D E R
This court, on October 13, 2011, affirmed the trial court’s judgment. On October 20, 2011, appellant’s attorney filed in this court a motion to withdraw as court-appointed counsel. The obligation of an attorney appointed on appeal ends at the conclusion of the direct appeal after counsel sends the appellate court’s opinion and judgment to his client and gives his client notice regarding the right to file a petition for discretionary review. Counsel in this case has complied with these obligations, and appellant has filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals a pro se motion for an extension of time in which to file a petition for discretionary review.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw as court-appointed counsel is dismissed as moot.
November 3, 2011 PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
McCall, J., and Kalenak, J.
Document Info
Docket Number: 11-09-00344-CR
Filed Date: 11/3/2011
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/16/2015