Ex Parte Devan S. Matthews ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                              Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    September 23, 2014
    No. 04-14-00625-CR
    Ex Parte Devan S. MATTHEWS,
    Appellant
    From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2009CR11609
    Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    On June 16, 2014, the trial court denied Appellant’s pre-trial application for writ of
    habeas corpus. Appellant had thirty days to file a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a);
    Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Green v. State, 
    999 S.W.2d 474
    ,
    476 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1999, pet. ref’d).
    Appellant concedes he did not timely file a notice of appeal, but he asserts he had no
    notice or actual knowledge of the appealable order within twenty days of the date the order was
    signed. Cf. TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(c) (no notice in civil case); TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a (same).
    However, in a criminal case, neither Appellate Rule 4.2 nor Civil Rule 306a applies. E.g.,
    Dewalt v. State, 
    417 S.W.3d 678
    , 689–90 (Tex. App.—Austin 2013), pet. ref’d, 
    426 S.W.3d 100
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (“Although [no notice of the appealable order] might excuse an untimely
    notice of appeal in a civil case, ‘[n]o comparable rule exists for criminal cases,’ and Texas courts
    have routinely held, as we must do here, that being unaware of an appealable order or judgment
    does not excuse an untimely notice of appeal.” (second alteration in original) (footnotes
    omitted)); Pope v. State, No. 05-10-01455-CR, 
    2011 WL 924477
    , at *2 (Tex. App.—Dallas Mar.
    18, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (same).
    A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. 
    Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522
    ; 
    Green, 999 S.W.2d at 476
    . In this case, Appellant concedes the notice of
    appeal was not timely filed but moves this court to grant an extension of time to file the notice of
    appeal.
    A late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeal’s
    jurisdiction if
    (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing,
    (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen
    days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and
    (3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time.
    
    Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522
    ; see also Castillo v. State, 
    369 S.W.3d 196
    , 198 (Tex. Crim. App.
    2012) (“If a notice of appeal is not timely filed [under Rule 26.2 or Rule 26.3], the court of
    appeals has no option but to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”).
    Therefore, we ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within TEN DAYS from the
    date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See 
    Castillo, 369 S.W.3d at 198
    ; 
    Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522
    .
    _________________________________
    Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 23rd day of September, 2014.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-14-00625-CR

Filed Date: 9/23/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015