Edward Hernandez v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                 The State of
    Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    September 18, 2014
    No. 04-14-00647-CR
    Edward HERNANDEZ,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2013CR10559
    Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Eddie Hernandez pled nolo contendere to
    possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and was sentenced to ten years in
    prison in accordance with the terms of his plea-bargain agreement. On July 29, 2014, the trial
    court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-bargain case,
    and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After Hernandez filed
    a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this
    court. See 
    id. 25.2(e). The
    clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2)
    certification, has been filed. See 
    id. 25.2(d). “In
    a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were
    raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s
    permission to appeal.” 
    Id. 25.2(a)(2). The
    clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain,
    establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended
    by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See 
    id. The clerk’s
    record does not include a
    written motion filed and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave its
    permission to appeal. See 
    id. The trial
    court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately
    reflect that this is a plea-bargain case and that Hernandez does not have a right to appeal. We
    must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not
    been made part of the record.” 
    Id. 25.2(d). This
    appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d),
    unless an amended trial court certification showing that Hernandez has the right to appeal is
    made part of the appellate record by October 20, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1;
    Daniels v. State, 
    110 S.W.3d 174
    (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order).
    We ORDER all appellate deadlines be suspended until further order of the court.
    _________________________________
    Karen Angelini, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 18th day of September, 2014.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-14-00647-CR

Filed Date: 9/18/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015