Audreka Lynn Turner v. State ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                   IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-11-00020-CR
    AUDREKA LYNN TURNER,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    From the 361st District Court
    Brazos County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 09-03568-CRF-361
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Audreka Turner entered an open guilty plea to the state-jail felony offense of
    theft of property valued at less than $1,500 with two prior theft convictions. The trial
    court assessed a fifteen-month state-jail term. Turner appealed.
    Turner’s appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an
    Anders brief, asserting that she has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in
    her opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 
    87 S. Ct. 1396
    ,
    
    18 L. Ed. 2d 493
    (1967). Turner filed a pro se response; however, she does not raise any
    arguable issues. The State waived the filing of a brief. We will affirm.
    In an Anders case, we must, “after a full examination of all the proceedings, []
    decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.” 
    Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
    , 87 S.Ct. at 1400;
    accord Stafford v. State, 
    813 S.W.2d 503
    , 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is
    “wholly frivolous” or “without merit” when it “lacks any basis in law or fact.” McCoy
    v. Court of Appeals, 
    486 U.S. 429
    , 439 n.10, 
    108 S. Ct. 1895
    , 1902 n.10, 
    100 L. Ed. 2d 440
    (1988).
    We have conducted an independent review of the record, and because we find
    this appeal to be wholly frivolous, we affirm the judgment. Counsel must send Turner
    a copy of our decision by certified mail, return receipt requested, at Turner’s last known
    address. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4. Counsel must also notify Turner of her right to file a pro se
    petition for discretionary review. Id.; see also Ex parte Owens, 
    206 S.W.3d 670
    , 673-74
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).       We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, effective upon
    counsel’s compliance with the aforementioned notification requirement as evidenced by
    “a letter [to this Court] certifying [her] compliance.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4.
    REX D. DAVIS
    Justice
    Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Davis, and
    Justice Scoggins
    Affirmed
    Opinion delivered and filed March 21, 2012
    Do not publish
    [CR25]
    Turner v. State                                                                       Page 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-11-00020-CR

Filed Date: 3/21/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015