Raymond Broussard Jr. v. State ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                             NUMBER 13-12-00207-CR
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    ____________________________________________________________
    RAYMOND BROUSSARD JR.,                                                    Appellant,
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
    ____________________________________________________________
    On appeal from the 94th District Court
    of Nueces County, Texas.
    ____________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Benavides, Vela, and Perkes
    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
    Appellant, Raymond Broussard Jr., attempted to perfect an appeal from a
    conviction for robbery. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    Sentence in this matter was imposed on February 17, 2012. No motion for new
    trial was filed. Notice of appeal was filed on March 29, 2012. On March 29, 2012, the
    Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely
    perfected. Appellant was advised that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was
    not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court=s directive. Appellant
    has not responded to this notice.
    Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when
    notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended
    in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The
    time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the deadline
    for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule
    10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See 
    id. 26.3. Although
    the notice of
    appeal herein was filed within the 15-day time period for filing a motion for extension of
    time to file notice of appeal, no such motion for extension of time was filed. See 
    id. This Court's
    appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed
    notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). AWhen a
    notice of appeal is filed within the fifteen-day period but no timely motion for extension of
    time is filed, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction.@ 
    Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522
    .      Absent
    a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address
    the merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the
    appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 
    981 S.W.2d 208
    , 210 (Tex. Crim. App.
    1998).
    Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ of
    habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the
    availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM.
    2
    PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, ' 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 
    988 S.W.2d 240
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).
    The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
    PER CURIAM
    Do not publish.
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Delivered and filed the
    21st day of June, 2012.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-12-00207-CR

Filed Date: 6/21/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015