Johnny Savell v. Elizabeth C. Teel ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                  IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-10-00400-CV
    JOHNNY SAVELL,
    Appellant
    v.
    ELIZABETH C. TEEL,
    Appellee
    From the 278th District Court
    Walker County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 21123C
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Johnny Savell attempts to appeal from the trial court’s order holding Savell in
    contempt. By letter dated January 26, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Savell that
    the appeal was subject to dismissal because it appeared there was no right to appeal
    from an order of contempt. Deramus v. Thornton, 
    333 S.W.2d 824
    , 827 (Tex. 1960) (The
    validity of a contempt judgment can be attacked only collaterally by a writ of habeas
    corpus). Savell was further warned by the Clerk that the Court would dismiss the
    appeal unless, within 21 days from the date of the letter, a response was filed showing
    grounds for continuing the appeal.     Counsel for Savell responded by letter dated
    January 31, 2011 requesting a dismissal of the appeal. The letter, however, does not
    indicate that it was served on, or even copied to, the other parties to the appeal.
    This appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.
    Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the
    time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.
    P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also TEX. R.
    APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207(b); §
    51.941(a) (West 2005); and § 51.208 (West Supp. 2010). Savell did not pay the filing fees
    when presenting documents for filing. Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule
    and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 2.
    The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates
    or reduces the fees owed by Johnny Savell.
    TOM GRAY
    Chief Justice
    Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Davis, and
    Justice Scoggins
    Appeal dismissed
    Opinion delivered and filed February 16, 2011
    [CV06]
    Savell v. Teel                                                                        Page 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-10-00400-CV

Filed Date: 2/16/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015