Kerri Irene Danz v. State ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                          COURT OF APPEALS
    SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    FORT WORTH
    NO. 02-12-00383-CR
    KERRI IRENE DANZ                                                   APPELLANT
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                      STATE
    ------------
    FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 1 OF DENTON COUNTY
    ------------
    MEMORANDUM OPINION1
    ------------
    Appellant Kerri Irene Danz appeals the trial court’s revocation of her
    community supervision.
    Danz’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as
    counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel’s brief and motion meet
    the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation
    of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. 386
    1
    See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
    U.S. 738, 
    87 S. Ct. 1396
    (1967). Danz had the opportunity to file a pro se brief
    but did not do so; the State has not filed a brief.
    Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on
    the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this
    court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. See
    Stafford v. State, 
    813 S.W.2d 503
    , 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State,
    
    904 S.W.2d 920
    , 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may
    we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 82–
    83, 
    109 S. Ct. 346
    , 351 (1988).
    We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with
    counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in
    the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    , 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 
    206 S.W.3d 684
    , 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to
    withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
    PER CURIAM
    PANEL: MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
    DELIVERED: December 27, 2013
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-12-00383-CR

Filed Date: 12/27/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015