Tony Lamar Lockett v. State of Texas ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • Order filed July 22, 2010

     

                                                                           In The

                                                                                 

      Eleventh Court of Appeals

                                                                       __________

     

                                                             No. 11-10-00085-CR

                                                        __________

     

                                  TONY LAMAR LOCKETT, Appellant

     

                                                                 V.

     

                                          STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

     

                                       On Appeal from the 350th District Court

     

                                                                Taylor County, Texas

     

                                                        Trial Court Cause No. 7357-D

     

     

                                                                         O R D E R

                David W. Thedford, court-appointed counsel for Tony Lamar Lockett, has filed in this court a motion seeking to withdraw as counsel.  Mr. Thedford states that he is under radiation treatment for cancer and will be unable to prepare the brief.

                The appeal is abated in order that the trial court may appoint subsequent counsel. If it is determined that appellant has abandoned his appeal or that appellant is not indigent and has failed to make necessary arrangements for filing a brief, the trial court is directed to make specific findings in order that the appeal may be submitted on the record pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). If it is determined that appellant is indigent and is exercising his right to represent himself, the trial court must develop evidence as to whether appellant’s decision to proceed without counsel is knowingly and intelligently made and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law.  Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975); Ex parte Davis, 818 S.W.2d 64 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Hubbard v. State, 739 S.W.2d 341 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987); Webb v. State, 533 S.W.2d 780 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976). 

    The clerk of the trial court is directed to prepare and forward a supplemental clerk’s record containing the order appointing subsequent counsel and any other relevant orders.  In the event a hearing is conducted, the court reporter is directed to prepare and file a supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing.  The supplemental records are due to be filed in this court on or before September 7, 2010.  Appellant’s brief will be due to be filed in this court thirty days after the supplemental record is filed in this court.   

    The appeal is abated.

     

                                                                                                    PER CURIAM

     

    July 22, 2010

    Do not publish. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

    Panel consists of:  Wright, C.J.,

    McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-10-00085-CR

Filed Date: 7/22/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015