Donald Foster v. Rick Thaler ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                   IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-09-00393-CV
    DONALD FOSTER,
    Appellant
    v.
    RICK THALER,
    Appellee
    From the 278th District Court
    Walker County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 24,769
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Donald Foster appeals the dismissal of his lawsuit as frivolous under Chapter 14
    of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. He contends in two issues that the court erred
    because: (1) his pending recusal motion should have first been addressed; and (2) his
    lawsuit is not frivolous. We will affirm.
    Rule of Civil Procedure 18a(b) states in pertinent part, “On the day the motion
    [to recuse] is filed, copies shall be served on all other parties or their counsel of record,
    together with a notice that movant expects the motion to be presented to the judge three
    days after the filing of such motion unless otherwise ordered by the judge.” TEX. R. CIV.
    P. 18a(b). If a party fails to provide this notice, he waives the right to complain of a
    judge’s failure to recuse himself. Carson v. Serrano, 
    96 S.W.3d 697
    , 698 (Tex. App.—
    Texarkana 2003, pet. denied). Because Foster failed to provide this notice, he waived
    the right to complain of the judge’s failure to recuse himself. 
    Id. Thus, we
    overrule his
    first issue.
    Chapter 14 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code applies to suits filed by an
    inmate and accompanied by an affidavit or unsworn declaration of inability to pay
    costs.1    TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.002(a) (Vernon 2002); Hamilton v.
    Williams, 
    298 S.W.3d 334
    , 339 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, pet. denied). The trial court
    may dismiss such a suit if the inmate fails to comply with the requirements of Chapter
    14. See 
    Hamilton, 298 S.W.3d at 339
    .
    Section 14.004 requires the inmate to file an affidavit or unsworn declaration
    listing each suit (other than suits under the Family Code) the inmate previously filed.
    TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.004 (Vernon 2002). Because Foster did not
    comply with section 14.004, the court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing his suit.
    See 
    Hamilton, 298 S.W.3d at 339
    . Thus, we overrule his second issue.
    We affirm the judgment.
    FELIPE REYNA
    Justice
    1
    Chapter 14 does not apply to suits filed under the Family Code. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE
    ANN. § 14.002(b) (Vernon 2002).
    Foster v. Thaler                                                                           Page 2
    Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Reyna, and
    Justice Davis
    Affirmed
    Opinion delivered and filed October 13, 2010
    [CV06]
    Foster v. Thaler                               Page 3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-09-00393-CV

Filed Date: 10/13/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015