Christopher Ray Fitzgerald v. State ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •   

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

                                                             In The

                                                    Court of Appeals

                            Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

     

                                                    ______________________________

     

                                                                 No. 06-09-00194-CR

                                                    ______________________________

     

     

                             CHRISTOPHER RAY FITZGERALD, Appellant

     

                                                                    V.

     

                                         THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

     

     

     

     

                                           On Appeal from the 124th Judicial District Court

                                                                 Gregg County, Texas

                                                               Trial Court No. 38207B

     

                                             

     

     

     

                                              Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                                Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley


                                                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

     

                Christopher Ray Fitzgerald appeals from his convictions by the trial court on three charges of aggravated robbery.  Fitzgerald has filed a single brief, in which he raises an issue common to all of his appeals.  He argues that the trial court committed reversible error in denying his motion to sever his case from that of John Scott Kincaid, Fitzgerald’s cohort who was present during the commission of each aggravated robbery. 

                We addressed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date on Fitzgerald’s appeal in cause number 06-09-00193-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that error has not been shown in this case.

                We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

     

                                                                            Bailey C. Moseley

                                                                            Justice

     

    Date Submitted:          June 1, 2010

    Date Decided:             June 2, 2010

     

    Do Not Publish

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-09-00194-CR

Filed Date: 6/2/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015