Whitfield Davis Edwards v. State ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Dismiss and Opinion Filed August 23, 2013
    S   In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-13-00581-CR
    No. 05-13-00583-CR
    WHITFIELD DAVIS EDWARDS, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-17106-V, F10-17107-V
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices O’Neill, Francis, and Fillmore
    Opinion by Justice Francis
    Whitfield Davis Edwards pleaded guilty to two offenses of tampering with government
    records. Following plea agreements in each, the trial court deferred adjudicating appellant’s
    guilt and placed him on community supervision for two years. The court also assessed a $1,200
    fine in cause no. 05-13-00581-CR. Punishment was assessed in open court on February 19,
    2013, and the trial court certified that appellant was appealing the rulings on pretrial motions.
    Appellant filed motions for new trial on February 21, 2013 and notices of appeal on April 24,
    2013. We conclude we lack jurisdiction over the appeals.
    A motion for new trial is not a remedy available to a defendant who receives deferred
    adjudication. See Donovan v. State, 
    68 S.W.3d 633
    , 636 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). Thus, a
    motion for new trial is ineffective to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal in a case in
    which the defendant has received deferred adjudication. Murray v. State, 
    89 S.W.3d 187
    , 188
    (Tex. App.––Dallas 2002, pet. ref’d).
    In each case, the trial court deferred adjudicating appellant’s guilt on February 19, 2013.
    Therefore, appellant’s notices of appeal were due within thirty days of that date, that is, by
    March 21, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1); 
    Murray, 89 S.W.3d at 188
    . Appellant’s April
    24, 2013 notices of appeal are untimely, leaving us without jurisdiction over the appeals. See
    Slaton v. State, 
    981 S.W.2d 208
    , 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (per curiam).
    We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.
    /Molly Francis/
    MOLLY FRANCIS
    JUSTICE
    Do Not Publish
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47
    130581F.U05
    –2–
    S
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    WHITFIELD DAVIS EDWARDS,                           On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District
    Appellant                                          Court, Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. F10-17106-V.
    No. 05-13-00581-CR        V.                       Opinion delivered by Justice Francis.
    Justices O’Neill and Fillmore participating.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of
    jurisdiction.
    Judgment entered August 23, 2013
    /Molly Francis/
    MOLLY FRANCIS
    JUSTICE
    –3–
    S
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    WHITFIELD DAVIS EDWARDS,                           On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District
    Appellant                                          Court, Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. F10-17107-V.
    No. 05-13-00583-CR        V.                       Opinion delivered by Justice Francis.
    Justices O’Neill and Fillmore participating.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of
    jurisdiction.
    Judgment entered August 23, 2013
    /Molly Francis/
    MOLLY FRANCIS
    JUSTICE
    –4–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-13-00581-CR

Filed Date: 8/23/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015