Savannah Robinson v. Jose R. Carreras, M.D. ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                              NUMBER 13-11-00407-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    ____________________________________________________________
    SAVANNAH ROBINSON,                                                           Appellant,
    v.
    JOSE R. CARRERAS, M.D.,                             Appellee.
    ____________________________________________________________
    On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6
    of Hidalgo County, Texas.
    ____________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes
    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
    Appellant, Savannah Robinson, attempts to appeal a judgment entered on May
    25, 2011. On July 7, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the notice of
    appeal bears the incorrect cause number, 07-2834-F, and that the correct cause number
    is CL-07-2834-F. Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct
    the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if proper notice of appeal was
    not filed in the trial court within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the
    matter would be referred to the trial court for further action. On September 20, 2011, this
    Court notified appellant that the Court had not received a response to the July 7, 2011,
    letter. Appellant was advised that the notice of appeal bears the incorrect cause number
    and that failure to cure the defect within ten days would result in the appeal being
    dismissed. No response has been received from appellant.
    Appellant has failed to amend the notice of appeal within the time prescribed by
    this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(f), 37.1. Additionally, appellant has failed to
    comply with a requirement of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and a notice from
    the Clerk of the Court.       See 
    id. 42.3(c). The
    Court, having examined and fully
    considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed
    for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF
    JURISDICTION. See 
    id. 42.3(a), (c).
    PER CURIAM
    Delivered and filed the 3rd
    day of November, 2011.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-11-00407-CV

Filed Date: 11/3/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015