Regina Marie Dollarhide v. State ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •   

     

    IN THE

    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

     

    No. 10-10-00051-CR

     

    Regina Marie Dollarhide,

                                                                                        Appellant

     v.

     

    The State of Texas,

                                                                                        Appellee

     

     

       


    From the 413th District Court

    Johnson County, Texas

    Trial Court No. F41503

     

    MEMORANDUM  Opinion

     

    Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  We have not issued a decision in this appeal.  Appellant personally signed the motion.  Accordingly, the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

     

    REX D. DAVIS

    Justice

     


    Before Chief Justice Gray,

    Justice Reyna, and

    Justice Davis

    Motion granted; appeal dismissed

    Opinion delivered and filed June 16, 2010

    Do not publish

    [CR25]


     

    e Davis substantially complied, we have all the information, verified as required or authorized, to request a response or to deny the petition.  I would request a response to confirm what I believe is the reason the petition for expunction has not been acted upon by the trial court.

    Merits Review

                Davis filed a petition for the expunction of records in the 361st District Court, the Honorable Judge Steve Smith presiding.  Now that we have a copy of the expunction petition, it is clear that the records Davis seeks to have expunged are from a proceeding before Judge Smith when Judge Smith was judge of County Court at Law No. 1, not the 361st District Court.  The petition for expunction has to be filed in the court where the proceeding to be expunged was originally filed and not the court wherein the judge now sits.  Thus, Davis has filed the expunction petition in the wrong court.  

                Because Judge Smith has no duty to rule on an expunction motion filed in the wrong court, and at best all he could do is dismiss the improperly-filed proceeding, I concur in the Court’s denial of Davis’s petition for writ of mandamus, but not the reasoning thereof. Accordingly, while it may be the best practice for the trial court judge to promptly dismiss a petition for expunction when it is filed with the wrong court, I can concur in the denial of the petition.

     

                                                                            TOM GRAY

                                                                            Chief Justice

     

    Concurring opinion delivered and filed August 25, 2010

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-10-00051-CR

Filed Date: 6/16/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015