Joe Lee Touchstone v. State ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                  NO. 07-12-00239-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    AT AMARILLO
    PANEL B
    JUNE 22, 2012
    EX PARTE JOE LEE TOUCHSTONE
    ___________________________
    Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
    ORDER
    Joe Lee Touchstone, a prison inmate appearing pro se, has filed a pleading in
    this court asserting he has been unlawfully incarcerated by the State of Texas since
    February 13, 1991, because his underlying conviction and sentence are void. He asks
    that we initiate proceedings leading to a declaration that the underlying conviction is
    “null and void.”   In an opinion dated October 14, 1991, we affirmed Touchstone’s
    conviction for aggravated sexual assault in cause number 07-91-0054-CR. No petition
    for discretionary review was filed and mandate issued on December 12, 1991. 1
    1
    We judicially notice these facts as recited in our opinion in In re Touchstone,
    No. 07-03-0489-CV 2003 Tex. App. Lexis 10013, at *1 (Tex.App.--Amarillo Nov. 25,
    2003, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). We also judicially notice Touchstone’s history of
    attempts to obtain post-conviction relief in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and in
    federal court. See Touchstone v. Quarterman, No. 2:09-CV-0057, 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis
    2633, at *1-2 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2009) (stating history), adopted, 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis
    24714 (N. D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2009).
    As an intermediate appellate court, we have no post-conviction jurisdiction to
    consider the relief Touchstone requests by his pleading because the exclusive means of
    challenging a final felony conviction is in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals according
    to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann.
    art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2011); Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 
    802 S.W.2d 241
    , 243
    (Tex.Crim.App. 1991) (orig. proceeding) (stating only the Texas Court of Criminal
    Appeals has jurisdiction over post-conviction felony proceedings).
    Accordingly, we dismiss this proceeding for want of jurisdiction
    It is so ordered.
    James T. Campbell
    Justice
    Do not publish.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-12-00239-CR

Filed Date: 6/22/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015