Brian Victorian v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                     COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
    FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
    ORDER OF ABATEMENT
    Appellate case name:        Brian Victorian v. The State of Texas
    Appellate case number:      01-13-01004-CR
    Trial court case number: 1363644
    Trial court:                182nd District Court of Harris County
    The time for appellant to file his brief has passed. Appointed counsel for appellant, Kurt
    B. Wentz, filed a request for extension of time to file appellant’s brief on April 23, 2014. We
    granted that motion, extending the deadline to file appellant’s brief to June 27, 2014. To date, no
    brief or further request for extension has been filed.
    As such, we must abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing at
    which appellant and Kurt B. Wentz shall be present in person. 1 The court coordinator of the trial
    court shall set a date for said hearing and notify the parties, including appellant. We direct the
    trial court to make appropriate written findings of fact and conclusions of law and to execute any
    necessary orders on these issues:
    1) Whether appellant still wishes to pursue this appeal;
    2) If so, whether Kurt B. Wentz has abandoned this appeal and should be allowed to
    withdraw;
    3) Whether appellant is now indigent and entitled to appointed counsel; and, if
    indigent, appoint new counsel on appeal, and
    4) If appellant is not indigent:
    a. whether he has retained an attorney to file a brief, and, if so, obtain the
    name, address, and telephone number of retained counsel;
    b. if appellant has not retained counsel, the trial court shall admonish
    appellant of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, and
    1      If appellant is now incarcerated, he may appear by closed video teleconference. Any such teleconference
    must use a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a simultaneous compressed full
    motion video and interactive communication of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any
    attorneys representing the State or appellant. On request, appellant and his counsel shall be able to
    communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney representing the
    State.
    i. determine whether appellant is knowingly and intelligently
    waiving his right to counsel; or,
    ii. if appellant does not wish to proceed pro se, provide a deadline by
    which appellant must hire an attorney.
    See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(a), (f); Oliver v. State, 
    872 S.W.2d 713
    , 716 (Tex.
    Crim. App. 1994); Minjares v. State, 
    577 S.W.2d 222
    , 224 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); cf. TEX.
    CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(g).
    The trial court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing and file
    the reporter’s record with the Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order.
    Additionally, the trial court’s findings and recommendations and any orders issued pursuant to
    this hearing shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record and filed in this Court no later
    than 30 days from the date of this order. If the hearing is conducted by video teleconference, a
    certified electronic copy of the hearing shall be filed in this Court no later than 30 days from the
    date of this order.
    The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active
    docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental
    clerk’s record and reporter’s record of the hearing are filed in this Court.
    It is so ORDERED.
    Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown
     Acting individually       Acting for the Court
    Date: August 14, 2014
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-13-01004-CR

Filed Date: 8/14/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015